Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1302

reference
37-tree-1
name
1302
tree-preservation-order

undefined

37-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.981790 50.849860)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.981762 50.849857,-0.981763 50.849863,-0.981767 50.849868,-0.981781 50.849875,-0.981790 50.849876,-0.981799 50.849875,-0.981807 50.849872,-0.981813 50.849868,-0.981819 50.849858,-0.981818 50.849852,-0.981814 50.849847,-0.981807 50.849843,-0.981791 50.849840,-0.981774 50.849843,-0.981768 50.849847,-0.981762 50.849857)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL